Highlights :
Abstract :
Keywords : Fire Sales | Liquidity ratios | Bank Run | Saving Allocation
JEL : E44, G01, G18, G21
- The liquidity of saving matters for fire sales and their welfare effects.
- The banking sector can be both too risky and too big.
- Liquidity ratios can increase incentives for depositors to invest into bank deposits.
Abstract :
In this paper, we introduce a new mechanism into a banking model featuring distressed sale of assets (fire sales). As in reality, depositors choose between the liquid deposits of banks and the illiquid assets of funds from which early withdrawals are not possible. Our model reflects that dynamics, showing that two inefficiencies arise due to a pecuniary externality. The first inefficiency is well-known: banks do not keep enough liquidity buffers. The second inefficiency is that depositors do not invest the optimal amount into institutions that can be subject to runs (banks) relative to institutions that are preserved from runs (such as pension funds). To investigate whether there is too much deposits in banks or in pension funds, the direction of the inefficiency is studied numerically. Simulations show that the banking sector can be too big relative to pension funds, and that liquidity ratios -aimed at making banks less riskycan decrease welfare by increasing incentives to deposit into banks.
Keywords : Fire Sales | Liquidity ratios | Bank Run | Saving Allocation
JEL : E44, G01, G18, G21
Back